Tattoos - horrible or what?
does anybody else agree with me that Tatto's are probably the worst thing a person can have done? - used to be sailors and criminals only had them - now middle aged women have em sticking out of their bum crack. eeuugh.
Answers:
All one needs to do is look at tattoos on someone age 60+ and see how badly they've sagged and faded. That would be reason enough not to get one. Not to mention, that the larger or more visible ones can get in the professional way or someone's career. Good Luck to those who've gotten inked but I'll pass, thank you.
Each to their own
i dont mind them,my daughter has three.
they are beautiful..
The only difference between tattooed people and none tattooed people is that tattooed people don't moan and whine about people who aren't tattooed.
Each to their own!
yes sure. its horrible.
I agree . I don't have any and don't want any
depends on personal preference. i have 2 on my back, but they are in places that are easy to cover up cos i dont wanna look horrible when im older. i dont like the ones when people have them on their arms, legs etc, they dont even look good when you're young
i don't have any, i don't like them for me, but i think some people look cute with them. and like everything in life when you overdo it, it looks discuting..But hey whatever rocks you boat, we have to respect everyone's individuality.
Then don't look at the middle aged women's bum crack!
Tattoos are body art. They are personal expressions of beauty and personal freedom. One must be very sure about what they want to express since tattoos are permanent. Removed tattoos leave a definite scar.
each their own. What could be wrong with a tastefull drawing on someones body
I don't agree that they're horrible at all. If you don't like them, don't get one, but it's not fair to look down on the people who do like them. No one is trying to force you to get one.
Ha ha..xx
I say what ever floats your boat ,My son has a cross on his arm and his name over top and under it is beautiful ,but now I dont like the evil ones nor do I like many but to me one is ok ,some people can look ok with them and some not .so I guess its all about what you as a person likes .
My Dad is covered in them and my brother but I can't stand the sight of them especially on woman there repulsive
Tattoos are form of self exspression for people, but iI do agree that one can get carried away with it.
Its a personal preference, If you don't like what you see, than don't look!
i agree if its plastered EVERYWHERE is disgusting but nothing wrong with a little one where people cant really see them i like the ones on the back little tribal ones black no colours i think colours in it are tacky! but women have them on their arms like men and chest thats disgusting ! ankles aswell with colours! urghhh revolting!
i like em.
I think each to their own. I like tatts on people ; it does not necessarily mean you are a criminal if you have a tat. People are now getting some decent tattoos and not just the typical ones you would expect. A tattooist can do some very good art work !
It all depends on what they have. I have three and I am 38, so it depends on what they like to get. I have seen some that are not too pretty.
As long as they're tatsteful they are nice.
I think there great and far too many people without tattoos moan about people who have them, its up to them if they want a tattoo whether it looks good or not.
Its the same with people moaning about older people that botox!!If it makes them feel better and happier and there in the right frame of mind about getting it what is the problem, whinge about something else! lol
i'm so glad you asked this!
i would never ever get one they are so tacky and i wonder how many regret having them.
Here Here!
You tell it like it is!
I have 2 one on my shoulder and one on my ankle! i think they are brilliant. i do thik however you have to be 100% sure of what your getting and where you put them! i really thought about the one on my ankle, and i just thought i dont give a damn what any1 else thinks about them! and when im old and saggy i wont have my ankles on show will i. its also your own body no1 elses so you should be able to do what the hell you want to do 2 it! i want another 3 done and i'll be happy! so shove that up ya middle age womens tattooed bum crack!
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and for me I feel that it depends on the size and the location of the tat. Super huge tats on women are unappealing but if that's what they like then let them be.
Some are skanky, some are tasteful, wouldn't be into it myself tho
Yes, of course. They are widely regarded by the smarts as down-market - (i.e., the mark of an ill-bred, ill-read, no-brained slob.!)
And few would deny that's what the vast majority of people with tattoos invariably turn out to be. Especially tattooed men - who are generally so very, very dumb that, apart from having their own bodies daubed in ugly blue ink) violence is their only means of expression.
has anyone used one of those home laser hair removal things?
How do you remove stubborn unwanted logo's from clothes?
how can you stop yourself from being sick during prgency?
hey whats up how is your life?
where in COVENTRY, ENGLAND can i find a nice pair of black shoes for under £10.?
Would you ever buy clothing (garments) off the internet?
how do i apply hair extensions without doing a training course?
do bobs look good or bad? im really tempted but have really thick hair?
I really want a tattoo on my wrist..?
Answers:
All one needs to do is look at tattoos on someone age 60+ and see how badly they've sagged and faded. That would be reason enough not to get one. Not to mention, that the larger or more visible ones can get in the professional way or someone's career. Good Luck to those who've gotten inked but I'll pass, thank you.
Each to their own
i dont mind them,my daughter has three.
they are beautiful..
The only difference between tattooed people and none tattooed people is that tattooed people don't moan and whine about people who aren't tattooed.
Each to their own!
yes sure. its horrible.
I agree . I don't have any and don't want any
depends on personal preference. i have 2 on my back, but they are in places that are easy to cover up cos i dont wanna look horrible when im older. i dont like the ones when people have them on their arms, legs etc, they dont even look good when you're young
i don't have any, i don't like them for me, but i think some people look cute with them. and like everything in life when you overdo it, it looks discuting..But hey whatever rocks you boat, we have to respect everyone's individuality.
Then don't look at the middle aged women's bum crack!
Tattoos are body art. They are personal expressions of beauty and personal freedom. One must be very sure about what they want to express since tattoos are permanent. Removed tattoos leave a definite scar.
each their own. What could be wrong with a tastefull drawing on someones body
I don't agree that they're horrible at all. If you don't like them, don't get one, but it's not fair to look down on the people who do like them. No one is trying to force you to get one.
Ha ha..xx
I say what ever floats your boat ,My son has a cross on his arm and his name over top and under it is beautiful ,but now I dont like the evil ones nor do I like many but to me one is ok ,some people can look ok with them and some not .so I guess its all about what you as a person likes .
My Dad is covered in them and my brother but I can't stand the sight of them especially on woman there repulsive
Tattoos are form of self exspression for people, but iI do agree that one can get carried away with it.
Its a personal preference, If you don't like what you see, than don't look!
i agree if its plastered EVERYWHERE is disgusting but nothing wrong with a little one where people cant really see them i like the ones on the back little tribal ones black no colours i think colours in it are tacky! but women have them on their arms like men and chest thats disgusting ! ankles aswell with colours! urghhh revolting!
i like em.
I think each to their own. I like tatts on people ; it does not necessarily mean you are a criminal if you have a tat. People are now getting some decent tattoos and not just the typical ones you would expect. A tattooist can do some very good art work !
It all depends on what they have. I have three and I am 38, so it depends on what they like to get. I have seen some that are not too pretty.
As long as they're tatsteful they are nice.
I think there great and far too many people without tattoos moan about people who have them, its up to them if they want a tattoo whether it looks good or not.
Its the same with people moaning about older people that botox!!If it makes them feel better and happier and there in the right frame of mind about getting it what is the problem, whinge about something else! lol
i'm so glad you asked this!
i would never ever get one they are so tacky and i wonder how many regret having them.
Here Here!
You tell it like it is!
I have 2 one on my shoulder and one on my ankle! i think they are brilliant. i do thik however you have to be 100% sure of what your getting and where you put them! i really thought about the one on my ankle, and i just thought i dont give a damn what any1 else thinks about them! and when im old and saggy i wont have my ankles on show will i. its also your own body no1 elses so you should be able to do what the hell you want to do 2 it! i want another 3 done and i'll be happy! so shove that up ya middle age womens tattooed bum crack!
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and for me I feel that it depends on the size and the location of the tat. Super huge tats on women are unappealing but if that's what they like then let them be.
Some are skanky, some are tasteful, wouldn't be into it myself tho
Yes, of course. They are widely regarded by the smarts as down-market - (i.e., the mark of an ill-bred, ill-read, no-brained slob.!)
And few would deny that's what the vast majority of people with tattoos invariably turn out to be. Especially tattooed men - who are generally so very, very dumb that, apart from having their own bodies daubed in ugly blue ink) violence is their only means of expression.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.