What is the ideal system of government for the judicial rights of any denomination, creed or ethnicity?
Answers:
Elected representatives who have a firm constitution to work within, and who can be held responsible by the electorate.
Benevolent dictatorship.
I personally would like to see a system of State Government where the Civil Service are the general practitioners of Government, a parliament where the power to oversee and ensure that the policy was correctly adhered to, (Public affairs committees where Civil Servants and held accountable for and policy decisions), (the privy council, cabinet, house of commons and house of lords are consigned to the waste bin of redundant organs of state), A Judiciary where accountability and pleas against Mal practise could be brought and tested, the party system are treated as pressure groups to advance their cause in the forum of public debate, (receiving the same monies from the public purse as any other pressure group). A legislative body divorced from the Accountability Judiciary, to codify the proposals refined by public debate. All treaties to be ratified by referendum, (on the American model if we don’t like it, it doesn't happen even if signed by one man who thought we might like it. This is to stall the imposition of unidirectional treatise). The power to raise taxes is at the local level, at the point of residence regulated by a local elected council (councils to appoint Public Affair Committee Members, he who pays the piper calls the tune). The power of the media would have to be strictly observed to reduce the power of demagogues and rabble rousers to that end the press complaints commission would have to be strengthened the use of rumour, un-substantiated claims, speculation, and hysterical slanders will need to be rigorously investigated and culprits exposed (media moguls, reporters and pamphleteers both digital and printed will be held accountable for the veracity of their products)
Everyone would have freedom of expression and freedom of worship. Faith and ethnicity would be regarded as essentially private matters, therefore state functions, such as law-making and education should, as far as possible, be secular, i.e. not aligned to any particular faith-based system.
This would be impossible to achieve in reality, however, as all social activity, including governanace, stems from some cultural basis.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.