Chocolate vs samsung e900?
Which is better and why??
Answers:
Both are Neck to neck.
see here http://www.google.com/trends?q=lg+chocol.
It's no secret that LG and Samsung are sworn enemies in the battle to be the best consumer technology manufacturer in the world. One sector where the two South Korean giants are fighting it out like Godzilla and Mothra is the mobile phone industry.
Samsung has had a great couple of years with handsets like the hugely popular SGH-D500 and SGH-D600. It's also pushed technological boundaries with phones like the impressive SGH-i300, which has a 3GB hard drive, and the SCH-B600, which features a whopping 10-megapixel camera lens.
Meanwhile LG has tried to compete with the plasticky 3G-enabled U880, and earlier this year the elusive, not yet on sale, P7200 clamshell phone, which has a 2-megapixel camera with autofocus. Fortunately, LG has now pulled its act together and designed the beautiful LG Chocolate phone, aka the LG KG800, launched in the UK last month. The phone has sold over 400,000 units in South Korea, making up around 7 per cent of the South Korean market this year. It could well be similarly successful in Europe and the US, which would bring LG to the forefront of the worldwide mobile phone market.
Unsurprisingly, Samsung has hit back with a similar slider handset, the Samsung SGH-E900. According to Mobile, Samsung is launching the E900 six weeks early in a bid to outdo LG's Chocolate phone. But how do the two phones stand up side by side? Has Samsung created a Chocolate killer?
From what i know, the SGH-E900 has the same black glossy front as the Chocolate phone and also uses a touchpad. Unlike the Chocolate phone, it has EDGE support, a 2-megapixel camera (as opposed to the Chocolate's 1.3-megapixel camera) and an expandable microSD memory slot -- the Chocolate has no memory expansion at all. Based on features, the E900 packs more punch than the Chocolate phone, but it does weigh 10g more and in our opinion doesn't have the same wow factor in its appearance. first impressions suggest this might be a victory for LG.
Samsung.the end.
i,ve just bought my bf the samsung and he loves it
Chocolate cos it always makes me happy (especially Cadbury dairy milk) but if i need to make a phone call then i suppose i better go for the E900
Always chocolate.
Samsung.
Just take a look at all Samsungphones. And compare them with LG phones.
You'll know why.
At Phones 4 U the chocolate is 149.95, and the e900 is 179.95.
In my honest opinion the fact that the samsung seems to have better features doesn't make it the better phone, the chocolate is the one for me
(a) it looks a hell of a lot nicer,
(b) it comes with a velvety pouch to keep it clean, a stereo headset with remote control for mp3s, and a charm with a cleaning pad for wiping off fingermarks, a data cable, and the pc software in rather stunning packaging. The e900 only comes with charger data cable, software, a bland looking headset and a boring box.
(c) it comes with 128mb internal memory whereas the e900 only has 80mb which you can expand but it costs more money and
(d) the chocolate comes in nicer colours. ie. Wine Red!! so the nicest lloking phone out!
mmm chocolate cos its chocolate lol
No comparison ! Got to be E900. If you want a phone just purely for it's looks then probably the the LG may have the edge for some people. The LG is very very basic phone function wise and camera is poor.
Samsung is better in every department except internal memory but is expandable where as LG is not. I think the E900 is a better size and shape also !
out of the two choices the samsung e900. personally i'd rather had a packet of crisps than a "chocolate" and a TV than a samsung e900.
Most suited camera?
why are there dropouts on my firewire sound card?
How can something be 'new and improved'?
what does weee mean?
Tevion MDJUKE 420 Problem!?
What is the best value MP3 player in stores at the moment?
what was the best thing before sliced bread?
can anyone tell me why my washing machine is not using frabric conditioner, just filling up with water.?
is it possible for someone to interfere with your txts?
Answers:
Both are Neck to neck.
see here http://www.google.com/trends?q=lg+chocol.
It's no secret that LG and Samsung are sworn enemies in the battle to be the best consumer technology manufacturer in the world. One sector where the two South Korean giants are fighting it out like Godzilla and Mothra is the mobile phone industry.
Samsung has had a great couple of years with handsets like the hugely popular SGH-D500 and SGH-D600. It's also pushed technological boundaries with phones like the impressive SGH-i300, which has a 3GB hard drive, and the SCH-B600, which features a whopping 10-megapixel camera lens.
Meanwhile LG has tried to compete with the plasticky 3G-enabled U880, and earlier this year the elusive, not yet on sale, P7200 clamshell phone, which has a 2-megapixel camera with autofocus. Fortunately, LG has now pulled its act together and designed the beautiful LG Chocolate phone, aka the LG KG800, launched in the UK last month. The phone has sold over 400,000 units in South Korea, making up around 7 per cent of the South Korean market this year. It could well be similarly successful in Europe and the US, which would bring LG to the forefront of the worldwide mobile phone market.
Unsurprisingly, Samsung has hit back with a similar slider handset, the Samsung SGH-E900. According to Mobile, Samsung is launching the E900 six weeks early in a bid to outdo LG's Chocolate phone. But how do the two phones stand up side by side? Has Samsung created a Chocolate killer?
From what i know, the SGH-E900 has the same black glossy front as the Chocolate phone and also uses a touchpad. Unlike the Chocolate phone, it has EDGE support, a 2-megapixel camera (as opposed to the Chocolate's 1.3-megapixel camera) and an expandable microSD memory slot -- the Chocolate has no memory expansion at all. Based on features, the E900 packs more punch than the Chocolate phone, but it does weigh 10g more and in our opinion doesn't have the same wow factor in its appearance. first impressions suggest this might be a victory for LG.
Samsung.the end.
i,ve just bought my bf the samsung and he loves it
Chocolate cos it always makes me happy (especially Cadbury dairy milk) but if i need to make a phone call then i suppose i better go for the E900
Always chocolate.
Samsung.
Just take a look at all Samsungphones. And compare them with LG phones.
You'll know why.
At Phones 4 U the chocolate is 149.95, and the e900 is 179.95.
In my honest opinion the fact that the samsung seems to have better features doesn't make it the better phone, the chocolate is the one for me
(a) it looks a hell of a lot nicer,
(b) it comes with a velvety pouch to keep it clean, a stereo headset with remote control for mp3s, and a charm with a cleaning pad for wiping off fingermarks, a data cable, and the pc software in rather stunning packaging. The e900 only comes with charger data cable, software, a bland looking headset and a boring box.
(c) it comes with 128mb internal memory whereas the e900 only has 80mb which you can expand but it costs more money and
(d) the chocolate comes in nicer colours. ie. Wine Red!! so the nicest lloking phone out!
mmm chocolate cos its chocolate lol
No comparison ! Got to be E900. If you want a phone just purely for it's looks then probably the the LG may have the edge for some people. The LG is very very basic phone function wise and camera is poor.
Samsung is better in every department except internal memory but is expandable where as LG is not. I think the E900 is a better size and shape also !
out of the two choices the samsung e900. personally i'd rather had a packet of crisps than a "chocolate" and a TV than a samsung e900.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.