What do English people think about the sentences?
1. "Alarm systems installers" or "Alarm systems fitters"
2. What do you think about this sentence: Alarm systems installers predominated the guests. It’s worth taking notice that the company's trademark recognition is growing very rapidly
Answers:
i guess
Are you from the planet ZOG
what does predominated mean? never heard it before
"installers" rather than "fitters"
The sentence sounds fine.
i think the sentence should the read
the alarm system installers/fitters predominated the guests. It is worth noting that the company's trademark recognition is growing rapidly.
hope this helps
1. Either phrase is fine and has the same meaning.
2. The first sentence in this bit implies to me that the alarm systems installers were quite aggressive and were trying to take over the rest of the guests.
I think what you mean is that there were more alarm systems installers there than any other type of guest, in which case this sentence might be better:
The guests were predominantly alarm system installers.
This uses the same words but placed in a different order, it makes for a better meaning.
1. Doesn't matter. Installer and fitter are synonimous.
2. Predominate is not often used as an active verb.. So if you must use it, the better way would be 'Alarm systems installers were predominant among the guests.' I would then replace 'taking notice' with merely 'noting'. But hell, it's a dull piece of writing..
I would say;
1 Alarm System Installers/Fitters (no s on the end of system)
2 The predominant guests were Alarm System Installers. It is worth noting that recognition of the company's trademark is growing rapidly.
alarm system installers not systems & as for the sentence i think its a load of poo sounds like u are trying too hard to look smart but it doesnt make any sense! x
The Additional 's' you put in the first one sounds a bit redundant.
"Alarm system installers" would work just as well.
installing is more technical than fitting.
"Alarm systems installers" sounds better.
Both boring so I pick #1 because it was over fastest.
Why to make research on sentence-if you have understood what it want to reflect/say-language is about communicating what you want to reflect or say-no need to make research except for giving exams or official works!
If you were to take the words that you currently have and replace them with some totally unrelated words,and made them intersting,you might have something to work with.
I hate the imported US office/commercial/marketing speak which started in the 1980s. Why can't the sentence just read:
The majority of guests were alarm fitters, which was proof that the company's trademark was quickly becoming recognised in the trade.
Its Rubblish and that we should go to the planet ZOG
1. I would prefer "Alarm systems fitters"
2. I would prefer : Alarm systems installers were predominant among the guests. It’s worth noting that recognition of the company's trademark is growing very rapidly.
whats prime number?
An Englishman says..?
Given the problems in the past should sterilisation be compulsory for old women that live in shoes?
i need some fun facts and figures to make a quiz up for my under 8's while we eat a 4 JULY meal we are british
Why is the standard size for paper 8 1/2 by 11? Where did that come from?
im wanting to find my gcse results from1995.what info do i need to give to you so i can receive my results?
Does anyone study Law in University? Is it hard?
plural words ending in s?
Why can't you use the expression brainstorming any more?
2. What do you think about this sentence: Alarm systems installers predominated the guests. It’s worth taking notice that the company's trademark recognition is growing very rapidly
Answers:
i guess
Are you from the planet ZOG
what does predominated mean? never heard it before
"installers" rather than "fitters"
The sentence sounds fine.
i think the sentence should the read
the alarm system installers/fitters predominated the guests. It is worth noting that the company's trademark recognition is growing rapidly.
hope this helps
1. Either phrase is fine and has the same meaning.
2. The first sentence in this bit implies to me that the alarm systems installers were quite aggressive and were trying to take over the rest of the guests.
I think what you mean is that there were more alarm systems installers there than any other type of guest, in which case this sentence might be better:
The guests were predominantly alarm system installers.
This uses the same words but placed in a different order, it makes for a better meaning.
1. Doesn't matter. Installer and fitter are synonimous.
2. Predominate is not often used as an active verb.. So if you must use it, the better way would be 'Alarm systems installers were predominant among the guests.' I would then replace 'taking notice' with merely 'noting'. But hell, it's a dull piece of writing..
I would say;
1 Alarm System Installers/Fitters (no s on the end of system)
2 The predominant guests were Alarm System Installers. It is worth noting that recognition of the company's trademark is growing rapidly.
alarm system installers not systems & as for the sentence i think its a load of poo sounds like u are trying too hard to look smart but it doesnt make any sense! x
The Additional 's' you put in the first one sounds a bit redundant.
"Alarm system installers" would work just as well.
installing is more technical than fitting.
"Alarm systems installers" sounds better.
Both boring so I pick #1 because it was over fastest.
Why to make research on sentence-if you have understood what it want to reflect/say-language is about communicating what you want to reflect or say-no need to make research except for giving exams or official works!
If you were to take the words that you currently have and replace them with some totally unrelated words,and made them intersting,you might have something to work with.
I hate the imported US office/commercial/marketing speak which started in the 1980s. Why can't the sentence just read:
The majority of guests were alarm fitters, which was proof that the company's trademark was quickly becoming recognised in the trade.
Its Rubblish and that we should go to the planet ZOG
1. I would prefer "Alarm systems fitters"
2. I would prefer : Alarm systems installers were predominant among the guests. It’s worth noting that recognition of the company's trademark is growing very rapidly.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.