Isn't there a pill that UK council estate mums can take to stop them popping out so many children?
One that is a bit stronger than the ones they are supposed to be taking now?
Answers:
Go live on an estate for a few years, forget you asked this question, wisen up, and ask another question when your a little less ignorant.
. Society creates opportunities for people, and we are all a result of the society we live in, with people who have your attitude towards life, no wonder our civilization is going down the pan.
There are no council estate mums, only many individuals who need to survive, and its not a matter of how many children you have, but how well you look after them..
. Like I said, come back when your a little more aware.
yeah but would they take it? it all boils down to ignorance. ps im from a council estate and im kid-free so dont tar us all with the same brush!
Blame Jim Callaghans labour gov of the late 70's. They put single mums top of housing waiting lists. Maybe if single mums were'nt entitled to housing it would prevent some of the teenage pregnancies. Maybe.
if only
of course their is, but you have to educate them so they can read the instructions. and it shoudl state quite clearly on the packet, failure to use this product will not get you a council house.
Birth Control Pills
huh
why is it just the mums you are slagging off?
someone has to sleep with them in the first place.. it takes two to tango, and not all council estate people are the same either
They'll do anything when pissed
Yeah its called the contraceptive pill, but that means getting off their fat arses and getting it for free (like they do everything else) and showing a bit of responsibility.
It is unfair to single out single mothers , what about the blokes who gets away with the responsiblities (male answerer)
Hey it takes two to tango so think the bloke needs to be responsible too and not just on council estates ! Live and let live !
If your question was a joke... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha aha ha ha ha that was sooooooooooo funny !....NOT !
Just grind the pills up and dissolve them in the nation's supply of Barcadi Breezers. That should do the trick.
No, wazza point...where's me fags and me dawghtarrrr?
Ignorant,smart-a*s bast*rd.Fu*k up.
They dont take the ones they should anyway.
Apart from E`s
bloody chavs.
Isn't there a condom that men can use to stop getting women pregnant?? NOT JUST DOWN TO WOMEN!!!
*laughs*
probs not.maybe they should introduce a tax on council estate mums havin children?
I'm currently working on a council estate and I've seen it all ! The single mums who can dress their kids in designer gear, the Incapacity Benefit scroungers who cant work but can spend all day at their allotment digging ! The brand new people carriers for their kids to be ran to school in,Sky T.V. £350 dogs, and NO jobs !
Great innit !
It is not only Council Estates, anyway it takes two to tango.
This is very right wing.
You might as well just suggest leathal injections which end their life, then there won't be these problems.
Why don't you just crawl back under the stone you belong under.
anthrax
ASA held between the knees, unfortunately it tends to drop when inebriation sets in. Same as rich ones, but they can afford to go for a private (D)ust and
(C)lean if things get tacky.
If you find one let me know, my sister sure as hell can do with one. other than that taking 100 paracetamol might work too.lol
I wish!
But don't worry they can carry on pumping out the future State dependant low life, and my taxes will pay for it.
sorry i have to agree.
it all started in the early 80's when the cane was banned. the young ens grew up with no discipline. teenagers who were lazy f u ck ers screwed away to get tubbed so they could get a council flat. bucking against the system and with one goal in life..to have parties in the hood man, ooooh i love it up me shuv it in bad boy aaaaarrrrggghhh, is all you could hear. from the dirty tarts.
evry thursday friday saturday would bring a new daddy for conner kyle or meticka .stupid fu ck in g names , but they are every where..aaaaaaaarrrrrrggggghh. bring back national service and save this land aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
i have a good idea peeps..sterilise the fu ck ers sterilise criminals so they can not polute the world aaaaaaaaaaaaargh hhhheeeeellllp
yes it's called the U- Killed me Mom pill.
The demographic situation is this. Over the country as a whole the number of people having children is dropping. Numbers are increasing in certain sections of our community, but on the whole the trend is downward. Numbers of children coming through schools show this. Where I live teachers are being laid off or being made redundant or retiring teachers are not being replaced due to falling numbers. A school with a Yr R intake of 45 now only has an intake of 20. The school I did my final TP at had a school roll of 340 children. It has now just over 200 and is projected to become one form entry in the next 2 -3 years. And this is in an inner city underprivileged area. The children of today are the tax payers of the future. Their taxes will be paying for our pensions. The fewer there are, the less money generated by taxation, the poorer our pensions will be. Do your homework next time and stop opening your mouth to hear your stomach rumble.
call ssd! and take it with them.
YOUNG MUMS: MYTHS AND FACTS
------------------------------.
Myth:"There is an epidemic of teenage pregnancy in the UK today."
Fact: Despite media headlines, overall teenage pregnancies have fallen nationally by 9.4% since 1999.
Myth: "Young people are just too promiscuous."
Fact: In 2000, almost three-quarters of young women waited until they were 16 or over to have sex.
Myth: "Young people today are careless about contraception."
Fact: In a recent study, only 7% of young men and 10% of young women aged 16-19 said they had used no form of contraception the first time they had sex. The proportion of young people not using any form of contraception has decreased substantially in recent years.
Myth: "In my day, girls were much less likely to get pregnant."
Fact: In 1970, young women aged 15 to 19 in England and Wales were almost twice as likely to become mums as they are today.
Myth: "They only do it to get a council house."
Fact: Seven out of ten 15 and 16 year old mothers, and around half of 17 and 18-year-olds stay at home. In fact, most young mums have little knowledge of housing policy before getting pregnant - and what they do know often turns out to be wrong.
Myth: "They only do it to get benefits."
Fact: Pregnant young women under 16 are not entitled to any benefits; 16-18 year-olds get between £33.50 and £44.05 a week. When their baby is born, they get between £102.01 and £112.56 per week. This has to pay for equipment like cots and prams, nappies and clothes, as well as food, bills, and any extra costs like childcare.
However, as with housing, most young mums have little knowledge of social security policy before getting pregnant.
Myth: "They can't look after their kids."
Fact: Evidence suggests that young parents take the responsibilities of parenthood very seriously: the needs of their children are always high on the agenda. Several studies show young mums cope just as well as older women in similar circumstances.
Myth: "Young mums are all poor and have no education."
Fact: This one is a little closer to the truth. Young women from unskilled manual backgrounds are twice as likely to become teenage mothers as those from professional backgrounds. Young women with lower educational achievement - and low self-esteem - are also significantly more likely to become teenage mums. Unfortunately, this trend continues after young mums have their children.
Hmm.the social exclusion question. Seems you are not getting the support you yearn for. You missed out the act of daddy, who by now is far away.
But what about the children who have (as you succinctly put) 'popped out'? The present government is already taking on to the 'theory of probability', brought to it by the actions of (of all people) the New Zealand government taskforce. They are 'labelling' foetuses as 'potential young offenders'.this is a serious attempt to 'reduce' offending by targeting preventive services at children early on.and you can't get more earlier than still in the womb. The thinking is that 'enough' is known about the traits of people who go on to commit serious crime to to identify them before they are born. They suggest new mothers are to be surveyed in hospital, and children 'identified' as at risk should go onto a database where they would be singled out for 'extra intervention' before they get into trouble. It begs the question whether such technology can be used as an accurate measure.
Of course, it is in use here and now - and is advanced.
As drum_n_bass asks.would mothers take such a drug - the government (if of course that was discussed) may think not, hence the Orwellian method, but labelling a child, be it as 'antisocial' or as 'liable to truant' will truly be damaging to their self image and self-esteem.which in the long run may become a self-fulfilling prophesy.
If a nuclear bomb was set off and you had 10 Minutes what you do?
Another question for the ladies?
do women have anything like true love? why does their love always go hand in hand with the money a man has?
It's that Noah time of millenium again, storms a coming. What would you call your boat and what would you save
why do we bother answering questions from fools like hanuman.this site is becoming a haven for weirdos?
what do u think is the sexiest job to have?
Where is Sportugal?
Do you believe everything happens for a reason?
Answers:
Go live on an estate for a few years, forget you asked this question, wisen up, and ask another question when your a little less ignorant.
. Society creates opportunities for people, and we are all a result of the society we live in, with people who have your attitude towards life, no wonder our civilization is going down the pan.
There are no council estate mums, only many individuals who need to survive, and its not a matter of how many children you have, but how well you look after them..
. Like I said, come back when your a little more aware.
yeah but would they take it? it all boils down to ignorance. ps im from a council estate and im kid-free so dont tar us all with the same brush!
Blame Jim Callaghans labour gov of the late 70's. They put single mums top of housing waiting lists. Maybe if single mums were'nt entitled to housing it would prevent some of the teenage pregnancies. Maybe.
if only
of course their is, but you have to educate them so they can read the instructions. and it shoudl state quite clearly on the packet, failure to use this product will not get you a council house.
Birth Control Pills
huh
why is it just the mums you are slagging off?
someone has to sleep with them in the first place.. it takes two to tango, and not all council estate people are the same either
They'll do anything when pissed
Yeah its called the contraceptive pill, but that means getting off their fat arses and getting it for free (like they do everything else) and showing a bit of responsibility.
It is unfair to single out single mothers , what about the blokes who gets away with the responsiblities (male answerer)
Hey it takes two to tango so think the bloke needs to be responsible too and not just on council estates ! Live and let live !
If your question was a joke... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha aha ha ha ha that was sooooooooooo funny !....NOT !
Just grind the pills up and dissolve them in the nation's supply of Barcadi Breezers. That should do the trick.
No, wazza point...where's me fags and me dawghtarrrr?
Ignorant,smart-a*s bast*rd.Fu*k up.
They dont take the ones they should anyway.
Apart from E`s
bloody chavs.
Isn't there a condom that men can use to stop getting women pregnant?? NOT JUST DOWN TO WOMEN!!!
*laughs*
probs not.maybe they should introduce a tax on council estate mums havin children?
I'm currently working on a council estate and I've seen it all ! The single mums who can dress their kids in designer gear, the Incapacity Benefit scroungers who cant work but can spend all day at their allotment digging ! The brand new people carriers for their kids to be ran to school in,Sky T.V. £350 dogs, and NO jobs !
Great innit !
It is not only Council Estates, anyway it takes two to tango.
This is very right wing.
You might as well just suggest leathal injections which end their life, then there won't be these problems.
Why don't you just crawl back under the stone you belong under.
anthrax
ASA held between the knees, unfortunately it tends to drop when inebriation sets in. Same as rich ones, but they can afford to go for a private (D)ust and
(C)lean if things get tacky.
If you find one let me know, my sister sure as hell can do with one. other than that taking 100 paracetamol might work too.lol
I wish!
But don't worry they can carry on pumping out the future State dependant low life, and my taxes will pay for it.
sorry i have to agree.
it all started in the early 80's when the cane was banned. the young ens grew up with no discipline. teenagers who were lazy f u ck ers screwed away to get tubbed so they could get a council flat. bucking against the system and with one goal in life..to have parties in the hood man, ooooh i love it up me shuv it in bad boy aaaaarrrrggghhh, is all you could hear. from the dirty tarts.
evry thursday friday saturday would bring a new daddy for conner kyle or meticka .stupid fu ck in g names , but they are every where..aaaaaaaarrrrrrggggghh. bring back national service and save this land aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
i have a good idea peeps..sterilise the fu ck ers sterilise criminals so they can not polute the world aaaaaaaaaaaaargh hhhheeeeellllp
yes it's called the U- Killed me Mom pill.
The demographic situation is this. Over the country as a whole the number of people having children is dropping. Numbers are increasing in certain sections of our community, but on the whole the trend is downward. Numbers of children coming through schools show this. Where I live teachers are being laid off or being made redundant or retiring teachers are not being replaced due to falling numbers. A school with a Yr R intake of 45 now only has an intake of 20. The school I did my final TP at had a school roll of 340 children. It has now just over 200 and is projected to become one form entry in the next 2 -3 years. And this is in an inner city underprivileged area. The children of today are the tax payers of the future. Their taxes will be paying for our pensions. The fewer there are, the less money generated by taxation, the poorer our pensions will be. Do your homework next time and stop opening your mouth to hear your stomach rumble.
call ssd! and take it with them.
YOUNG MUMS: MYTHS AND FACTS
------------------------------.
Myth:"There is an epidemic of teenage pregnancy in the UK today."
Fact: Despite media headlines, overall teenage pregnancies have fallen nationally by 9.4% since 1999.
Myth: "Young people are just too promiscuous."
Fact: In 2000, almost three-quarters of young women waited until they were 16 or over to have sex.
Myth: "Young people today are careless about contraception."
Fact: In a recent study, only 7% of young men and 10% of young women aged 16-19 said they had used no form of contraception the first time they had sex. The proportion of young people not using any form of contraception has decreased substantially in recent years.
Myth: "In my day, girls were much less likely to get pregnant."
Fact: In 1970, young women aged 15 to 19 in England and Wales were almost twice as likely to become mums as they are today.
Myth: "They only do it to get a council house."
Fact: Seven out of ten 15 and 16 year old mothers, and around half of 17 and 18-year-olds stay at home. In fact, most young mums have little knowledge of housing policy before getting pregnant - and what they do know often turns out to be wrong.
Myth: "They only do it to get benefits."
Fact: Pregnant young women under 16 are not entitled to any benefits; 16-18 year-olds get between £33.50 and £44.05 a week. When their baby is born, they get between £102.01 and £112.56 per week. This has to pay for equipment like cots and prams, nappies and clothes, as well as food, bills, and any extra costs like childcare.
However, as with housing, most young mums have little knowledge of social security policy before getting pregnant.
Myth: "They can't look after their kids."
Fact: Evidence suggests that young parents take the responsibilities of parenthood very seriously: the needs of their children are always high on the agenda. Several studies show young mums cope just as well as older women in similar circumstances.
Myth: "Young mums are all poor and have no education."
Fact: This one is a little closer to the truth. Young women from unskilled manual backgrounds are twice as likely to become teenage mothers as those from professional backgrounds. Young women with lower educational achievement - and low self-esteem - are also significantly more likely to become teenage mums. Unfortunately, this trend continues after young mums have their children.
Hmm.the social exclusion question. Seems you are not getting the support you yearn for. You missed out the act of daddy, who by now is far away.
But what about the children who have (as you succinctly put) 'popped out'? The present government is already taking on to the 'theory of probability', brought to it by the actions of (of all people) the New Zealand government taskforce. They are 'labelling' foetuses as 'potential young offenders'.this is a serious attempt to 'reduce' offending by targeting preventive services at children early on.and you can't get more earlier than still in the womb. The thinking is that 'enough' is known about the traits of people who go on to commit serious crime to to identify them before they are born. They suggest new mothers are to be surveyed in hospital, and children 'identified' as at risk should go onto a database where they would be singled out for 'extra intervention' before they get into trouble. It begs the question whether such technology can be used as an accurate measure.
Of course, it is in use here and now - and is advanced.
As drum_n_bass asks.would mothers take such a drug - the government (if of course that was discussed) may think not, hence the Orwellian method, but labelling a child, be it as 'antisocial' or as 'liable to truant' will truly be damaging to their self image and self-esteem.which in the long run may become a self-fulfilling prophesy.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.