You have a choice. 1 year of money (guaranteed lets say 200,000), or 3 years of health.Which do you take?
Answers:
3 years of health! you can still earn money, but most health cannot be bought or cured. Rather the long term effect than the short tem effect.
the money so i can buy lots of weed and have a good time
I would say the money could cover more than 3 years of health, given that it isn't serious hospitilization.
3 years of health
Just because I'm young and still infallible in my niave mind, I'd take the cash. Now ask me the same question thirty years from now, and I'm sure I'll put more thought into it.
health
my ans is health
3 years health. health = priceless. priceless> price
the 1st one because u could spend some of the money on gym membership
off course money! health can be managed if you have money.
I'll definitely go for the money. As opting for three years of health doesn't mean that we'll be healthy forever. Health can't be preserved but the money can be.
Show me the money!!
3 years health, your health is the most precious thing in the world
I would take the health - you don't miss it until you loose it.
Depends if I'm already healthy. If I am then it's the money. If not, then it's the health.
If you have health with no money you could die of frustration. The money guaranteed will help you solve lots of problems including the health issues . I take MONEY!
definitely the 3 years of health.
Depends on where you live. If the healthcare system is good, take the money; if it sucks, takes the health.
i would choose 1 year of money.
life is short. enjoy to the fullest.
do u mean 1 year of money ( + cancer and so ? ) against 3 years of health ? ... why u suppose that curses accompanying money ? lol
Health, unless i could use the money to make a loved one better, or cure someone..
if the money could be spent on a better cause than myself.then i'd take the money and give it where its needed...
I thought that would be easy to answer..but there are 2 ways of looking at it.i could take 3 years of my health for me SELFISH, i could take the money and spend it on me SELFISH..I could take the money and help a good cause...
So you see its not so easy to choose..
but i think i'd take the money and give it to a good cause..
The money ta very much, how soon can you get it to me, I can then go to a private hospital and get my health problems sorted out. xx
I would take both if I could but since I cant I would choose health its a long time thing
Id take the money..Life sucks ..
Health. If I'm sick I won't enjoy the money.
I would definitely take the health. If I was genuinely healthy, I could make that much in 3 years by taking on more work.
before i had a stroke i would probably chose the money..but now health is the one thing money cannot buy...so yet it is something when you loose it, it really become obvious how important health is... i choose health.
Well, let's see, you earn Pounds or is it Euros over in England, if you are from America it is dollars...where I'm from it's Rands so divide 200,000 by 17 for pounds or by 6 for dollars what the F*%$# will I be left with? I'll take health anyday!! It will cost me more to get treatment from the doctor anyway...
the cash every time
3 years of health definitely.money can be made, health.well, thats a different story.
There is insufficient information to make a choice. One would assume that most people would take the 200,000 as they assume their health is fine. Having 200,000 could buy you three years of health. It all depends on the current situation you are in.
What has to be sacrificed to get the 1 year of money, and is that permanent. Are you saying 3 years of ill-health?
Is the alternative to the money 3 years of starvation due to no money, no income, and therefore ill-health?
You cannot decide one way or the other as you have not specified the problem with sufficient information. In such a circumstance, I would not make a decision.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.