Who is a cheat; Darrell hair or Inzamam?
Answers:
Darrell Hair (ICC).
In cricket the umpire is always right
the Pakistan team should of just played on and won the match instead of turning it into a farce.
Inzy. Pakistanis are experts at ball tampering. Hair is a racist, but he was right this time. You do not gouge the ball and then get all self righteous about it.
can't b imzy, he never doctored the ball
Well the ball was defo roughed on one side and that's kinda the main tool for playing with sooooo who did that and why? gaining an advantage by having a better spin on the ball?
you cant really comment until you get the full story. inzy probably did cheat, but did hair see a chance to make some cash from the situation or did he invent the allegations? either way, the media again dramatised the stiuation that probably could have been resolved easily
yo mom maybe cheated armstrong81
yo you could tell me what channel they show cricket cause i love it Yup yup Mon
It's sad how these guys find ways to cheat in cricket. All the same I barely watch cricket now that my side (West Indies) let me down so much.
Even after clear evidence of hair’s lust and greed u think there is anybody else who cheated? And primarily and morally, as far as cheating accusation is concerned…it can never be laid on inzi. coz the charge was on the bowlers not on inzi…had inzi planned that thing… he would not have been operating with kaneria…he instead would have used two pacers 2 reverse swing the ball…the ball was in hair’s custody when cook got out and that ball swung a great deal….but just after 3 more overs they felt that well…there is something fishy!! I firmly believe hair had also cheated in his previous matches because the way he showed us his lust for money and hurting the game of cricket…he is a pure racist….
I believe as per past records Hair
Disciplinary hearing of Inzamam-ul-Haq over the charge of ball tampering and bringing the game todisrepute has been fixed up by ICC on 27th and 28th September at London under the supervision of adjudicator RanjMadugalle, I strongly feel that it is totally unfair to put the blame on anybody till the hearing is over and decision of displinary panel is known
Darrell Hair.
hair
Darrell hair.
Darrell Hair
ONE ANSWER DARRELL HAIR.
I agree with a previous answer- we will have to wait for the hearing to be over. But for people to say that Hair is a cheat just shows extreme naitivity. What good would come from him cheating. He saw something amis and looked at the ball and made a judment based on that. The truth, as much as it may hurt, is that he did the right thing given the circumstances. You definiatelly cannot call him a cheat! He may have made a mistake, but we all make mistakes and that does not make us cheats.
Then people say how he wants money. You forget that that was a rpivate email he sent which has been made public for some unknowm reason. I think what he was meaning by saying that is that he is not going to be pushed around and if the ICC want him to leave they will have to buy him out. People forget that the umpires are contrated out and this was his offer for a buy out.
Now because I don't feel Hair is a cheap doea it mean that I recon Inzi is a cheat. The hearing will determine if the ball was tampered with or not and we will have to wait to see what the findings are. But Inzi is the captain so unfortunatelly he will be held accountable because of his position of authority for any actions taken on the field. I suppose Pakistans previous record with ball tampering does not help.
But lets not all jump to conclusions. The ICC hearing will see all the evidence and make a decision we will all have to respect.
Thats a very simplisitic question.
The thing is, if any umpire is terrified of accusing any Asian team of cheating for fear he'll be called a racist then the umpire can't do his job properly. People DO cheat in cricket. Mike Atherton was caught in 1994. You can't overlook the fact that you suspect someone is cheating because they are Asian and you're scared you'll be called a racist. Everyone keeps jumping on this and calling Hair a racist but I think thats unfair. He was doing his job.
As for Inzy well I'm on the fence. He might have cheated he might not, I guess we'll never know, the main thing is that Hair did his job by voicing a suspicion. Thats what he's paid to do after all. To keep an eye on the game and speak up if he feels any dirty dealings have been going on.
Probably neither. I would say Hair acted in good faith, and you might also say that Inzamam-ul-Haq did not tamper with the ball.
Inzamam and Shahid Nazir
In cricket umpire's dicesion is the last dicesion so Inzy was wrong.
derrier hail
the one and only
aallu
inzamam ul haq
who always wrong
I'm not sure whether there was any ball tampering, and perhaps the protest, was not the right way to go about it, although, they are quite right to be angry at being called cheats.
I think though Hair was in the wrong though. If they tampering, which I'm not too sure really, he should have said about it at the tea interval, not straight away, and als to make allegations like that, you have to be 100% certain that there has been tampering, and I don't think was.
And then with the protest, th umpire should have done his upmost best to try and get the game to continue, but he didn't really give the game and the Pakistan team a chance, especially as the Pakistan team came out soon afterwards.
Both, possibly.
Inzamam
The activity of reverse swing was born in Pakistan and has produced a long line of great bowlers who then used this to their advantage. To facilitate reverse swing, the condition of the ball has to be intentionally changed as accepted in interviews by players but of course Pakistan think they have created an art form so are bold-faced after having been exposed. Now, they want the laws changed and dictate who should umpire their games.
The only mistake Hair made was to allow the batsmen to choose the replacement ball after he and the other umpire agreed that the ball condition was intentionally changed.
Darell Hair; if he had evidence of ball tampering he would have identified the culprit instead of letting Inzamam take the rap
Inzamam
Well lets put it this way I've never seen Darrell Hair twist his studs on both ends of the wicket on a good length, nor have i ever seen him excessively appeal for leg befores knowing its not out! And Darrell has never been caught on T.V "CLEANING" the ball with his thumb nail..so who really is the cheat?
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.