Is the Chelsea football team representitve of the London population?
Answers:
Is it bad its like that? I mean Arsenal is also in London with foreign imports. Both teams are strong tho I prefer Chelsea. What are you trying to get at, you should explain your question further, no offence.
Yes. They have been accepted so. yes they are.
I hope I'm nothing like Didier Drogba!
of course we are
sounds about right.
Yeah - all totally soft, can't do anything without the backing of billionaires, and they complain all the time. :D
Will
Not only in Chelsea in Arsenal too it's the same case eventhough Arsenal is better. All these managers look at the quality of players not their passport.
No way . not at all
no theres no arabs or aussies
I think so. You've got some loud-mouthed Englishmen, a couple of swanky Europeans and a whole load of other immigrants getting paid perfectly decent money for doing to jobs noone else wants to do, sounds about right. And, just like London, everybody moans about it, but those on the inside love it, and those on the outside are quietly jealous but shoot their mouths off to cover up for the fact that their team/city will never quite match up to the splendour of the kings road
No, Chelski represents everything that is wrong with modern football.
Of corz no.
But all the big teams are like this in all leagues.
I think this question sounds racism. Different colours are beautiful.
please i don't understand, do u mean whether chelsea lay the most sweetest football in london or they are the strongest team.
Please if u talk about good team or team that play most sweetest football. don't ever mention chelsea because they don't play good football, their own is to score they don't care about the fan or if fans are enjoy football that's why i cant be CHELSEA FAN cos i support good football and the team and the only team that plays the most sweetest football is MAN.U. and that's the team i support. ARSENAL also play good football and there are other teams also like LIVERPOOL E.T.C. Let me make it simple, PORTSMOUTH PLAYS GOOD AND BETTER FOOTBALL THAN CHELSEA.
yes
NO but it can be said to have covered majority of the population in london
Yes we are...the Chelsea team has players from all over the world...it is the same with the london population. I have been living in London for 13 yrs(since i was born) and Im am half English and half indian...there are so many ppl who are inter-racial..and Chelsea signifies all that...and that is exactly the reason why i support them
well they have more english players than arsenal, why don't you single them out?
and for your information, london is a very ethnically diverse city, so yes, it is representative
chelsea has 6 english first team players 7 with glen johnson who is out on loan. all england internationals.some good youngsters in the reserve and youth teams. just like any other club we have players from around the world as well .which can only benifit the english lads.now i don't wish to be rude but it seems from the tone of the question that you have a problem with that .after this is 2006
I don't think so..hard to compare.
99% of the players are there because of the big money !
Prime example is Ashley Cole.
John Terry maybe the exception.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.