Do you reckon inzaman ul haaq was guilty of ball tampering?
whether you think the pakistani cricket captain was guilty of ball tampering in the 4th test and The Oval?
Answers:
Maybe not Inzy, but Hair must have seen something wrong with the ball and must have been sure it was tampered with otherwise I doubt he would have done anything.
Several careers were at stake here, so for Hair to react without some sort of evidence would have been suicidal for his reputation as well as his career.
yeah I care yank....yep I'm sure he was , just like most bowlers are!!
no i dont mate to be honest!!
the cricket has hyped to much into this this.
and nor do i think the umpire was/is a racist!!
it was just a misunderstanding
Yes, of course, but after what happened with the Pope recently the cricket council probably didn't want to risk the burning of effigies and death threats if they found him guilty.
I wouldn't be at all surprised, but you didn't really expect them to give him a caning did you? It would have caused far too much of a stink politically between the Indian sub-continent nations and the rest.
Dude, take my words, if Pakistan were guilty of the whole scenario they won't have protested like the way they did, the game was in Pakistan's court, and still they protested because the were innocent, and Inzi is an honest player he dont do sh*t like that to fox a damn filthy batting line up of england. Asif had already broken their back then why shoudl Inzi scratch the ball? was it to get rid of tail ender. hilarious. And let me tell you that a few overs back Alester cook hit a six and the ball landed on concrete, a 30+ over ball when lands on concrete is bound to get an odd shape and it did.
Yes, I believe he is guilty, although impossible to prove and this has now set a precedent for all tampering accusations with all teams just walking off the pitch in future
Absolutely 100% not, if he was he would have been charged to be honest I don't know why Inzi was ever in the frame to be charged when he doesn't bowl.
yeh i think he did i think he acted like a **** the umpires decision should be final but no it turned into a fuking circus what umpires ever going to say if anythings wrong again after that circus.
not at all!! he was innocent . if he was guilty of it he wud not ahve been cleared of it, . he was innocent thts y he managed to get out of it, n why the hell he wud do that stupid act!! Pakistan was already at strong position that time, i wish i cud slap Hair on his face for bringing that great cricketor up to facing such inquires.
n some stupid have related that decision to pope incidence ... how sick :S
NO.! don't think so.
no
if they were then they probably wouldn't have protested even though they were winning the match
no he was innocent
Whether coverly or overtly, it was done, I am convinced. Now, as far as Inzy goes, he might not have ordered the man who did it. But as a captain, he is responsible for all acts of his team. Think of it this way, Hair may be racist and all that, but he is not a fool to stake his neck if he thought what he was doing was absolute rot. He had conclusive evidence. ICC, under pressure, as always, buckled. Only loss was to the game of cricket.
NO...he was not at all guilty...just because the Pakistani bowlers have the gifted art of reverse swing, it does not mean that they tamper with the ball!
Inzy is NOT at all the person who indulges in such acts.....
It's OK that you can't respect anybody but then you don't have the right to talk nonsense about smbody. He is such a great player n u should think not twice but thrice before talking such things. He is not guilty. And don't forget they were in winning position.
Everybody knows the fact. Inzy's face, his gesture speaks for him. Once again he has proved, that he is not only a great player but he is a great human being also. He cud hav appealed against the verdict bt he accepted the punishment. And the way he accepted his suspension is simply great.
I salute you Inzy!
I too - (like Cool_Hack.) - find cricket a turn-off.
BUT.! - the handling of this "ball-tampering" case is significant to every society in the world today. Indeed, if almost any Pakistani sportsman were not "guilty of cheating" - THEN IT WOULD BE A FIRST.!
Because, Pakistan is a dog-eat-dog jungle of corruption virtually from the cradle to the grave - where cheating is second-nature and widely regarded as the only way to survive.!
yep!!.....he was guilty....of tampering the ball!??!
Since I have not seen the match, it is not correctr on my part to give any opinion on this issue. Since the Adjudicator, who happened to be an Asian, has cleared Inzamam from the charge of ball tampering due to lack of evidence, the matter should be treated as closed as airing opinion by other people is not going to have any bearing on this issue now
No he wasn't bcoz if he was then why didn't it come in any cameras while there were 26 cameras.
Yes ! Pakistan can do anything for their ego massage. They do need psychological help.
Definitely not, to the charge of ball tampering.
how rediculous to accuse a person like inzi.he is one of the greatest sportsman of all times.he cannot do so as his whole carrear is simply undisputed.
Can anyone please tell me how I can go about getting some autographs?
Which American Football team has the best cheerleaders?
which italian player scored a hat trick in the 1982 world cup finals?
Will extreme ironing ever make it to the olympics?
why australia take back the ashes?
Is it right for club Judo players to compete with competition players of the sport?
So what is the Man U Excuse this morning?
where can u watch sky sport free on your computer ?
how do i join a junior fc?
Answers:
Maybe not Inzy, but Hair must have seen something wrong with the ball and must have been sure it was tampered with otherwise I doubt he would have done anything.
Several careers were at stake here, so for Hair to react without some sort of evidence would have been suicidal for his reputation as well as his career.
yeah I care yank....yep I'm sure he was , just like most bowlers are!!
no i dont mate to be honest!!
the cricket has hyped to much into this this.
and nor do i think the umpire was/is a racist!!
it was just a misunderstanding
Yes, of course, but after what happened with the Pope recently the cricket council probably didn't want to risk the burning of effigies and death threats if they found him guilty.
I wouldn't be at all surprised, but you didn't really expect them to give him a caning did you? It would have caused far too much of a stink politically between the Indian sub-continent nations and the rest.
Dude, take my words, if Pakistan were guilty of the whole scenario they won't have protested like the way they did, the game was in Pakistan's court, and still they protested because the were innocent, and Inzi is an honest player he dont do sh*t like that to fox a damn filthy batting line up of england. Asif had already broken their back then why shoudl Inzi scratch the ball? was it to get rid of tail ender. hilarious. And let me tell you that a few overs back Alester cook hit a six and the ball landed on concrete, a 30+ over ball when lands on concrete is bound to get an odd shape and it did.
Yes, I believe he is guilty, although impossible to prove and this has now set a precedent for all tampering accusations with all teams just walking off the pitch in future
Absolutely 100% not, if he was he would have been charged to be honest I don't know why Inzi was ever in the frame to be charged when he doesn't bowl.
yeh i think he did i think he acted like a **** the umpires decision should be final but no it turned into a fuking circus what umpires ever going to say if anythings wrong again after that circus.
not at all!! he was innocent . if he was guilty of it he wud not ahve been cleared of it, . he was innocent thts y he managed to get out of it, n why the hell he wud do that stupid act!! Pakistan was already at strong position that time, i wish i cud slap Hair on his face for bringing that great cricketor up to facing such inquires.
n some stupid have related that decision to pope incidence ... how sick :S
NO.! don't think so.
no
if they were then they probably wouldn't have protested even though they were winning the match
no he was innocent
Whether coverly or overtly, it was done, I am convinced. Now, as far as Inzy goes, he might not have ordered the man who did it. But as a captain, he is responsible for all acts of his team. Think of it this way, Hair may be racist and all that, but he is not a fool to stake his neck if he thought what he was doing was absolute rot. He had conclusive evidence. ICC, under pressure, as always, buckled. Only loss was to the game of cricket.
NO...he was not at all guilty...just because the Pakistani bowlers have the gifted art of reverse swing, it does not mean that they tamper with the ball!
Inzy is NOT at all the person who indulges in such acts.....
It's OK that you can't respect anybody but then you don't have the right to talk nonsense about smbody. He is such a great player n u should think not twice but thrice before talking such things. He is not guilty. And don't forget they were in winning position.
Everybody knows the fact. Inzy's face, his gesture speaks for him. Once again he has proved, that he is not only a great player but he is a great human being also. He cud hav appealed against the verdict bt he accepted the punishment. And the way he accepted his suspension is simply great.
I salute you Inzy!
I too - (like Cool_Hack.) - find cricket a turn-off.
BUT.! - the handling of this "ball-tampering" case is significant to every society in the world today. Indeed, if almost any Pakistani sportsman were not "guilty of cheating" - THEN IT WOULD BE A FIRST.!
Because, Pakistan is a dog-eat-dog jungle of corruption virtually from the cradle to the grave - where cheating is second-nature and widely regarded as the only way to survive.!
yep!!.....he was guilty....of tampering the ball!??!
Since I have not seen the match, it is not correctr on my part to give any opinion on this issue. Since the Adjudicator, who happened to be an Asian, has cleared Inzamam from the charge of ball tampering due to lack of evidence, the matter should be treated as closed as airing opinion by other people is not going to have any bearing on this issue now
No he wasn't bcoz if he was then why didn't it come in any cameras while there were 26 cameras.
Yes ! Pakistan can do anything for their ego massage. They do need psychological help.
Definitely not, to the charge of ball tampering.
how rediculous to accuse a person like inzi.he is one of the greatest sportsman of all times.he cannot do so as his whole carrear is simply undisputed.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.