Is the ball tampering true or is Darrell Hair just hates pakistan?
Answers:
pakistan crickers are renouned for cheating at cricket.i wont go into it as there are too many instances to mention but i will say they should be banned for a few years until they sort there act out.
The ball tampering is true!!! pakistan have been doing it the most for ages!!
The guy above me is a prick.
Hair is a dirty cretin, scumbag and dont think Pakistan love him either, he looks like a man who offer sweets to kiddies in exchange for sexual favours.
I think it was Darell Hairs fault!!
am afraid my dear.v r using very polite words for the blooody jerk daryl hair.hes so cruel and evil.he is a black spot on the game.definately he took money for all this..but IC thinks that only the players and specially aisan players can cheat and umpires are angels..huh.but look what IC is doing.and look what ex australian players are saying.it sall recism i am afraid..ICC might ban inzi for 8 matches.for putting the match to an end.but they might overlook what the umpires did..they are seeing the end mo re closely than the means...it has 2b asked from that blody cheat that whom did u c tempering the ball..and if u dint se anybody then y th hell did u award penalty runs..and even then when u saw paki team not coming outta ground.u shud have gone 2 inzi and told him that well..if u dont come..i will award it 2 englanad.but he didnt do any of the above.coz he never wanted to,,,,he wanted the same what happened...and sorry 2 comment on simon taufel's comments that he knows the aws better than any1..had that been the caase.he would not have given inzi run out in faisalabad as that was a complete matter of law......HATE HAIR
its definatley daryl hair at fault..had temparing been the case inzi would have used 2 fast bowlers instead of kaneria on the other end..do u expect kaneria 2 reverse swing th ball? when cook got out.ball wis with Hair.and just 3 ovrs later he found the ball tempered.the point is that when cook got out.ball was rversing.y didnt the bloody hair se at that time that something has been done2 the ball..it is quite possible that he himslf did it.what pakistan did was just a result of hair's decision..therefor before deciding why pakistan pulled outta match.ICC must look into hair's matter.if he is proven guilty ..pakistan is automatially free of charge!
Darrell Hair is racist and not only towards Pakistani's but also other South Asian countries.
Check the history and you will find out yourself.
The ball tampering is falls. Darrell Hair hates not only Pakistan, but all the Asian country's like India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Pakistan etc.
I think it will be true bcoz he can't just show his haterd...
The scumbag Daryl Hair not only hates Pakistan but all asian countries.But I don't blame Hiar for his stupidity and racim I am rather mad at ICC why they took him on elite panel of umpires? I tell you why (1) Because he can single handedly win matches for "Whites"
(2) He lives in England (3) He has a british prostitute girl friend (4) He stands in county matches to earn his bread and butter (5) The kwhole world knows he is bloody biased and gives decisions against asian teams. His obnoxious past speaks for itself. What he did with the Great Murali? Actually Daryl Hair is a bastard son of ICC and thus ICC has to entertain him. And I tell you one important thing Daryl Hair is such a bastard that he knew that Inzamam can not speak english well so he exploited his unability otherwise if he had done this to the likes of Imran or Wasim or even Shoiab Akhtar he would have got a real slap on his stupid face. I am very much disappointed with his action because the great game of cricket has always suffered with his foolish actions and ICC seems to be sleeping like a log.
darrell hair not a very trustworthy person.makes me wonder just how he became an umpire with such attitude.
It's true no offence..I can't say anything about the past but this time there is simply no proof.
ICC is for Europeon countries only they hate Asians. Same in the case for Muralitharan. There is always some discrimination between black and white
friends, i think what most of ull emphasize is absolutely true. me being an indian support pakistan in their fight against this racist fellow. he jus doesnt seem to like any of the players from the subcontinent.
and, the icc is lookin the other way eventhough they shud take immediate action on him.
the aussies have always been respectable people. but, this guy seems to be bringing them a huge pile of disgrace!
Ball tampering bull ****,we now get to the bottom of it Darell hair wants cash to resign he is a disgrace to the sport not one camera shows any ball tampering by Pakistan.
He should be sacked the racist pig!
Dirty Hair Hates Pakistan. He got the Money To Do This
Pakistan is A Great Team.
We will find out hopefully on Sept 15 when the ICC sits about the ball tampering situation. I think there will be no evidence of ball tampering but Pakistan will be warned about not attending the final session of play. But it is a catch 22 situation for Inzaman, if no allegations for ball tampering were made there would be no reason for a mini demo. ICC need to tread carefully in the cricket minefield.
hair hates not only pakistan but indian subcontinenet in general
I think it's highly unlikely this is racist - just a case of playing things absolutely by the book. The whole Hair problem appears to have come from this instance (and Pakistan's refusal to play left him and the other officials with no other course of action) and his no-balling of Muralitheran some years ago - bottom line then was that Murali WAS throwing under the laws of the game at the time - the Sri Lankan contingent here should be please that Hair in fact ended up drawing the ICC's attention to the problem with MM's action and his inability to fully extend his arm, allowing a rule change to be put in place which allowed Murali to continue bowling within the laws. Without that rule change Murali's action would still be illegal today.. I am appalled at the virulence of some of the previous answers here and have reported those who chose to throw personal abuse at Umpire Hair,
Sky sports was in hold of the coverage of the Oval test.
Sky had 24 cameras at that time, each covering a 15* (fifteen degree) of the ground.
Not even a single camera could catch the pictures of the Pakistani players tampering the ball, but a man standing at the stumps with glasses on did.
Isn't it hilarious?
Ball tempering is true.
who said pakistan guilty f.uk you take darell hair to ur mum tonight for half million
i think hair don like pakistan
True or not. Hair is Suar Ka Bacha. This was not the way to solve this problem which is prevailing, since, Shrfsraz's time. He messed up with Murali issue, also. But Brett Lee is Dood- ka- dula.
there wasn't any ball-tampering otherwise evidence would be shown!yes he definately hates the paki's...
ball tampering is always true, it just depends how you want to look at it.
eg, a cricketer throws the ball through the air to the wicket keeper or bowler, nothing happens to the ball.
OR he throws it so it bounces to the receiver. it gets slightly scuffed on the grass.
the ball is "artificially" altered because the player effect the wear.
players can "shine" the ball using spit but they are all wearing suncream on their faces/lips so what is to stop them rubbing that into one side?
No one has said what Pakistan are accused of doing, but if it is taking chunks out with a fingernail then it is entirely possible, or someone in the crowd had a go when it was hit for 6 or the player retrieving it.
As far as Hair is concerned, he discussed it with a COLOURED umpire before making a decision. Being fair to the batsmen too, a ball that suddenly reverse swings out of nowhere is quite a big issue so there is every right for complaint and as far as i know one of the batsmen said something to him about it.
You can accuse Hair of being a racist but what would be the inverse opinion if it was Billy Doctrove who had the record and had made the decisions. I think the racism claims are outrageous and 3/4 incidents over 15 years is no reason to condemn someone. The ICC didn't get called racist when investigating one of the Asian bowling actions (about 5 years ago, it might have been one of the Sri Lankans who was recorded in the nets from square of the line to check it was a legal action).
Conclusion: It could have been any umpire making the call but ball tampering is there, but not really anything anyone can stop on a minor level.
give us the evidence and icc we'll ban some pakistan players if u don't have evidence Hair must pay up
i will tell u that god is great and no one is graeter than god
This is an important issue. Clearly we all have a passion for the game. Please all remember that every decision in cricket is
"in the umpires opinion".
In the umpires opinion the ball had been tampered with. End of debate.
Following the example of the Pakistanis, if I'm given out lbw or stumped, or edge the ball through to the keeper, should i refuse to walk? Should I demand proof?
One final point, if Hair is proved right, i expect to hear all of you apologising. you never know, he might not sue you for libel!
Darryl HAir hates Asian teams.
Darrell Hair has always been officious and a bit of a bully. He also loves being the centre of attention, specially in self-created controversies. Furthermore, he has repeatedly given poor decisions against Pakistan who had twice reported him prior to the oval test. Finally he has a history of mistreating Asian players, as Sri Lankans and Indians will only too readily testify, and should not have been umpiring in this series in the first instance. The ICC is an inept body that always sides with umpires despite the fact that nearly all of them make terrible blunders due to their failure to use technology. This attitude has led to mistrust of umpires which Hair has exacerbated by his disgraceful behaviour over the years. Pakistan, like all other teams, do try to alter the condition of the ball in order to produce reverse swing but are the only ones to have been labelled cheats over the years. When other teams do it, they are called artists. English bowlers destroyed the Aussies last year with reverse swing created by tampering with the ball in several ways, including sugary saliva, and were hailed as masters instead of cheats by the usually hypocritical British press and fans. It is highly unlikely that Pakistan were genuinely guilty of ball tampering in this instance as TV footage proved otherwise. Hair had no business going out on a limb, and calling Pakistanis cheats, because all other umpires would have made absolutely sure of obtaining video evidence, as is common practice in test cricket. Accusing a team of cheating is an extremely serious matter requiring plenty of evidence, and is not something that can be brushed under the carpet as an umpire's opinion as some devious Hair supporters have tried to do. As subsequent events and 500,000 reasons (dollars) have shown, Hair knew all along that his case was weak, and now everyone knows what a scheming, manipulative fellow this 'letter of the law' operator really is. Whether he is a racist as well is open to question but there are many white people still deluding themselves that they are a superior race. He may be one of them. What is undeniable, however, is that all sorts of Asian haters have come out of their closets in his support since Inzy and Pakistan decided to stand up to his bullying. My only sorrow is that nice guy Inzy did not challenge him on the pitch as most other Pakistani captains, and those of other nationalities, would have done.
I wouldn't say that Hair "hates" Pakistan, thats a serious allegation to make.
I have no idea if it was true but to be honest I don't think an international umpire would have called them out about it if he did not at least have a really good suspicion.
Anyway, loads of people have been accused ofball tampering. Mike Atherton was accused back in 1994. Its not just an accusation they throw at "foreign" teams.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.