If rail travel in Britain was to be nationalised would it and could it be as cheap as the rest of Europe?
I have spent most of this year travelling parts of europe and am amazed at how cheap public travel is. Over 4 weeks by train i managed to go down the leg of Italy and back up to the north again, all through France and back to England all for roughly £140 without any Europasses. As i came to buy a ticket to go from London to Yorkshire, a two hour train trip, i was condemed to paying a whopping £80, double what id spent in 4 weeks in another country. Why such extreme prices??
Answers:
Because unlike european countries transport is not top of the agenda. The Car Lobby is very powerful in the UK.
It is our embarrassment to foriegn visitors when using British Rail after seeing how good the rail systems are in France, Germany, Italy etc.
Only if the government increase the central subsidy to the same level as other European governments.
The rail companies justify the massive rail prices saying that the money is invested into the network. I'm not persuaded this is a good reason given the massive subsidy the government provides and the profits the rail companies make. Rail travel used to be a nationalised industry until the mid nineties but has never used to be as cheap as Europe. Rail travel in Europe is cheap simply because of the amount of subsidy each network receives from their respective governments.
It's nationalised in Ireland and it's just as dear as in the UK.
it used to be till thatcher decided to sell everything off
It used to be nationalised many years back, but it was still expensive
The U.K. government is tax greedy always has been and has not changed for centuries.
Fares were expensive when it was nationalised too. The current system of franchising is actually barking mad and has greatly increased the cost to the treasury. If we were able to unravel the current shambles and go back to about 1993, and then have the government give to British Rail what they are spending now propping up the present mess, fares could be a lot lower - either that or the money could be invested to great advantage in better infrastructure.
Trouble is the government and the civil service have always hated rail transport. Unlike abroad where an efficient and affordable rail system is seen as a matter of national prestige. The govenment is in the pocket of the automotive industry. And the chancellor is too dependent on tax and VAT from motorists.That's why people drive more than in any other European nation and why the roads are so congested.
To correct a misconception, it wasn't Mrs Thatcher who privatised railways. You can blame Major for it - Thatcher had the sense to realise it was daft.
what do u think?
What is the best ferry company?
I hate the flight from the uk to the states, my legs ache any ideas ?
If i bring more than 10k to UK, what info do I need, and what do customs do with the info ?
how long does it take to travel the world by train?
Does anyone know if there is a central contact source for left luggage in a yellow cab in New York?
B&B in Belfast?
where is Kelvin John Round living?
Can someone please recommend a good hotel or rental villa in Florida close to Disney World?
Answers:
Because unlike european countries transport is not top of the agenda. The Car Lobby is very powerful in the UK.
It is our embarrassment to foriegn visitors when using British Rail after seeing how good the rail systems are in France, Germany, Italy etc.
Only if the government increase the central subsidy to the same level as other European governments.
The rail companies justify the massive rail prices saying that the money is invested into the network. I'm not persuaded this is a good reason given the massive subsidy the government provides and the profits the rail companies make. Rail travel used to be a nationalised industry until the mid nineties but has never used to be as cheap as Europe. Rail travel in Europe is cheap simply because of the amount of subsidy each network receives from their respective governments.
It's nationalised in Ireland and it's just as dear as in the UK.
it used to be till thatcher decided to sell everything off
It used to be nationalised many years back, but it was still expensive
The U.K. government is tax greedy always has been and has not changed for centuries.
Fares were expensive when it was nationalised too. The current system of franchising is actually barking mad and has greatly increased the cost to the treasury. If we were able to unravel the current shambles and go back to about 1993, and then have the government give to British Rail what they are spending now propping up the present mess, fares could be a lot lower - either that or the money could be invested to great advantage in better infrastructure.
Trouble is the government and the civil service have always hated rail transport. Unlike abroad where an efficient and affordable rail system is seen as a matter of national prestige. The govenment is in the pocket of the automotive industry. And the chancellor is too dependent on tax and VAT from motorists.That's why people drive more than in any other European nation and why the roads are so congested.
To correct a misconception, it wasn't Mrs Thatcher who privatised railways. You can blame Major for it - Thatcher had the sense to realise it was daft.
The answers post by the user, for information only, UKQnA.com does not guarantee the right.